Author: Ron Graham
This lesson examines an interpretation of the scriptures whereby the teachings of Jesus are regarded as exposition of the Law and the prophets rather than of the gospel. The idea is that Jesus preached a true interpretation of the law of Moses to show the Jews how to keep the law from the heart rather than legalistically and traditionally as they were doing. In this lesson we question whether this is a correct view of Christ's earthly ministry.
It is correct that Jesus criticised the scribes and teachers for their handling of the law. For example...
It is correct that Jesus encouraged people to keep the law. For example...
It is correct that Jesus expounded the law of Moses. For example...
It is incorrect that he confined himself to the law of Moses or that preaching the law was the thrust of his ministry or his over-all purpose...
Some say that the word "gospel" or euangelion in the Greek, simply means glad tidings. For example, the angel said to the shepherds, "Behold, I bring you glad tidings of great joy" (Luke 2:10).
The angel (Greek angelos) was simply announcing or proclaiming (Greek euangelizo) the happy event of Christ’s birth.
So, it is said, "gospel" simply means good news, so when Jesus proclaimed the gospel of the kingdom, all he did was announce a happy event at hand. For example, we read that Jesus "was going about in all Galilee, teaching in the synagogues of the Jews, and proclaiming the gospel of the kingdom" (Matthew 4:23).
This is taken to mean that he went about teaching the law of Moses, and in the course of that, he simply announced that the kingdom, of which the old testament prophets had spoken, was at hand.
Now see how, for example, this reasoning interprets the following: "The law and the prophets were proclaimed until John. Since then the gospel of the kingdom is preached" (Luke 16:16).
Jesus is supposed to be saying that the law and the prophets were proclaimed until John, and since then, Jesus had been expounding their words, and including in his exposition the announcement that the kingdom of which the prophets spoke was at hand.
By this interpretation, the "gospel" that Jesus proclaimed is seen as part of the old testament (the law, the psalms, and the prophets). Jesus is made to be simply announcing good news in the course of proclaiming the old law and prophets, rather than making known the new and distinct message that is about to supercede them. He did not, it is said, teach new doctrine that would apply in the new kingdom.
On the surface the above sounds like a reasonable argument, but when you think about it you are led to wonder...
These puzzlements do not arise, of course, if we take it that there is only one doctrine or gospel of Christ, not two, and if we see the cross as the centre, not the divider, of his teachings.
As we have said, some people teach that the ministry of Jesus was to preach the law of Moses. They say that his teaching was meant to give the true interpretation of the law of Moses, and to show the Jews how to keep it from a faithful heart, rather than only legalistically and traditionally.
The upshot of this idea, is that the ministry of Jesus is not a source of law and doctrine for Christians. Christ's words, from this viewpoint, should be treated as the sunset portion of the old testament, not as the dawning part of the new testament.
The effect of this teaching is that verses such as Matthew 19:9 on divorce and remarriage, or Matthew 18:l5-17 on correcting erring brethren, or Luke 22:19-20 on observing the Lord's Supper are not treated as instruction for the coming kingdom, but only for the time then present.
I trust that this study will help you in your mind to put the sayings of Jesus, where they belong, The marvelous "words in red", in our Bibles are an important part of the New Testament, a part of the gospel which is the power of God for salvation to those who believe (Romans 1:16).